I was trolling through Facebook when I came across an article which was posted by a friend of mine. The link to the article is in the Bibliography which you will find at the end of this. The following will address some of the assertions of the author of the article which were made, but will also address and underlying issue which seems to come up again and again, and that is the meaning of "value". I will admit that this article did hit a rather raw nerve because I have done quite a bit of volunteering over my years, but it shows just how much the focus must be toward a fiscal end in every pursuit.
Ms Walsh starts of with addressing her audience with the idea of using their New Year's resolutions to not volunteer. Pointing that volunteering is merely a mechanism for people to make themselves feel good about themselves. Then she questions whether or not it helps at all. In this she points out a simple fact that people who are using volunteering as a mechanism to get some method to feel good about themselves, as "good citizens" or otherwise are not "volunteering" at all but are obligating themselves. This is a theme which flows through the article. When you volunteer, it must be on your own terms because you are interested in doing it not because you expect something out of it.
"A lot of volunteering we do is inefficient. Schools ask that parents bake cakes to be sold to the children of other parents who have baked cakes. Most school events involve sausages on white bread and fizzy drinks, which is not recommended as a healthy diet. ..." (Walsh, 2018)Many of the "classic" volunteering activities are inefficient and pave the way for other problems which do crop up in the future. This is an argument which will be conceded to the author, however, these are not the only volunteering activities which are out there, they are just the most visible. Volunteering encapsulates many more activities than most people realize, and many people are actually doing unofficial-volunteer or more accurately unrecognized-volunteer work without even realizing it. Coach your children's sports team? Volunteer work. Are you a scout leader? Volunteer work. Officer of a recreational group? Volunteer work.
"Volunteering is not valued. If volunteering was valued we would have a separate resume for it, at parties would ask each other about their volunteering, and hours worked would contribute to superannuation. Volunteering is expected of people who are regarded as having the time to do it, that is, people who do care work at home, looking after their families, primarily women. Because women do care work their labour is not valued. If a job is valued it is rewarded with pay." (Walsh, 2018)Volunteering work is valued, especially by the organizations who use volunteers, and also by the volunteers themselves, something which will be discussed shortly. Why would it appear on a separate resume? It is work done, so it goes on a normal resume, to put on a separate one is a self-fulfilling argument. At parties people do discuss their volunteer work, most often they do not realize that they are talking about it. In some cases it is deliberately talked about (I sure as hell do). If it contributed to superannuation then it would not be volunteer work, it would defeat the purpose of it. It would simply be work.
Of course then Ms Walsh follows this up with the classic feminist argument, and it fits perfectly into her profile of volunteer work. Who she does not take into account is all of the retirees, male and female, who also do volunteer work, and also the unemployed who are often forced to do it on "work for the dole" schemes. They are not all "people who do care work at home," a lot of them do this work for social reasons. This part of the argument raises the "home work" value argument and uses it to reinforce the idea of volunteer work being done by women and thus needing to be paid work, thus to be valued.
"The volunteering that has greatest impact is done upstream and has a measurable outcome. Volunteering works when the aim is to change a broken system, to change a law or policy. This law or policy would be one that sees a requirement for volunteers, fundraising and charities abandoned, so there will be no expectation that the next generation will keep inefficient systems." (Walsh, 2018)Clearly the idea of the article is to get people to use the system that we have by paying taxes and writing to politicians. Or if they must volunteer, do so for organizations with political aims of some description, not that this would be surprising considering her previous remarks with regard to the "who volunteers" subject. In her opinion efficient and effective volunteering is the kind that makes changes in the world, but one that is efficient and effective in its volunteering so that the organization which comes behind does not have to clean up the mess behind. Again, this does not take into account other organizations which have volunteers and the reasons why they join.
Volunteer work is useful. For the volunteer most people think it merely provides resume packing. For people who really volunteer (rather being guilted, or forced into it) it provides self-worth. For the people who benefit from the organization in the cases of social welfare organizations, the measure is difficult to calculate. Yet this article would want to change these organizations to ones in which the employees were paid. In most instances, the regular clientele of the services simply could not afford the services.
The biggest problem here is the concept of "value", why does it always have to be attached to the all-mighty dollar? Why is unpaid work under-valued? There are many recreational organizations in which people give their time voluntarily without pay, expecting not to be paid, quite happily, I might add, because it gives them joy to do so. Does not the joy which they get from this work have some "value"? Does not the joy that they give others through doing this work also give "value"? In many cases if these organizations were set up on a commercial basis they could not exist because of the costs of the work put in on a volunteer basis by the people who do the work.
Not all work should be evaluated on the basis of what dollar value is attributed to it. It should be valued on the basis of the joy or "value" of the benefit of the people and what they gain from it. We need to seriously look at what "value" really is in our current world and no longer put a dollar value to it to really understand the "value" of things and especially volunteer work.
Bibliography
Walsh, C. (2018) "Volunteering doesn't make the world a better place", Sydney Morning Herald,http://www.smh.com.au/comment/volunteering-doesnt-make-the-world-a-better-place-20180104-h0dd25.html
No comments:
Post a Comment