Showing posts with label ethnicity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethnicity. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 June 2023

"White People": A Racial Slur

 Greetings,

There has been quite a bit of conversation, especially over the past years, about people identifying as one nation or another, identifying with their "roots" especially. There has been identification of "First Nations" people, within the boundaries of various current national boundaries. However, when it comes to "white people," they are overlooked. 

In fact, I would state that "white people" in itself is a racial slur. Why? If you examine all of the "white people" within a national boundary these days, you will find many different cultures and many different languages. It is important to recognise the original inhabitants even if they were white as well. Further, it is important to recognise that due to immigration you will often find a lot of different cultures within a national boundary, even if they are all "white."

This term, "white people" is offensive in the same way as any other generalisation of culture is offensive. It is merely not recognised by most because "white people" are the dominant, "white people" were the "conquerors" and "settlers." This is primarily used as a slur to categorise negative attributes or actions, either historical or current, which are being implied, what needs to be recognised is not all "white people" are committing these offences. There are all sorts of "white people." Then again, the same applies to "black people."

We should not say "black people" in the same way, for the same reasons. Under the heading of "black people" there are people of African descent, people of Pacific Island descent, and people of Australian indigenous descent, and likely others. They all certainly do not have the same cultures, as they did not live under the same environmental conditions, and they did not develop the same way. Categorisation by colour of skin, shape of face (Caucasian, Negro, etc.), all of these things may be biologically possible and tell us something about our roots, and common roots, in prehistory, but they should not be used to generally categorise people in a socio-cultural sense. Wouldn't it be nice if we were just all "people," without the necessity of the socio-cultural tags?  

There are discussions of "cultural appropriation" in regard to certain cultures. "Cultural appropriation is the inappropriate or unacknowledged adoption of an element or elements of one culture or identity by members of another culture or identity." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_appropriation) There seems to be a lot of regard and concern for some cultures and not others. It would seem that European cultures "white" cultures are ignored when it comes to this, because they are the "dominant culture," but offense can still remain. We need to be careful about how we deal with all cultures, regardless of where they originate, regardless of their time period, regardless if they are "dominant" or not. We need to be respectful of all cultures and how we present them.

Now, there are those who are going to claim that I am some sort of "white supremacist" or "Nazi" for making the statements that I have (likely, because I will be classified as "white"), and I consider these individuals foolish beyond words. To them, you have missed the point of what I have been saying. I am a firm believer in levelling the playing field in all aspects. The same care should be taken with all people and all cultures, regardless of the colour of their skin, nation's origin, or religious beliefs.

Maybe I should've changed the title to: Why can't we all just be "people"?

I apply the same to gender and sexual orientation for that matter. Care needs to be taken how we address one another as individuals, and as groups, even how we think about one another.

We need to begin to understand one another so we can begin to heal. This is the way forward. Hopefully then we can begin to see ourselves as "humanity" and work toward a better world.

Cheers,

Henry.

Monday, 18 April 2022

Why we will never be united...

 Greetings,

There are different reasons that we cannot be divided. I have used "never" in the title, but this a strong word. It is possible, but humans will have to get over things in their nature; that thing in their nature which inflames them, that encourages them to contend with their neighbour. The problem is that we are often told how we are different and these differences are emphasised as important, we are never told how we are similar, how we are alike. These divisions separate us and encourage us to build walls between us and divide ourselves even more. There are those who encourage these divisions, who live on the conflict between one another, and it is not just our governments. Maybe there is hope for us, but it will take something, acknowledging our similarities along with our differences.

Humans like to fight...

Human beings claim that we want peace, that we want to get along with one another, but in our essence it is doubtful a truth. Our politics are about contests one political party competes against another for votes, then they spend their entire time arguing about the best way to run the nation. Even in nations where there is a single party, the party spends a large portion eliminating opposition, defending itself against detractors. We enjoy contests against one another this is evident by the prolific presence of sport and the amount of money people are paid to play against one another. We watch these games where one team competes against another, willing one team to win over the other. Other leisure activities also contain conflict within them, usually adversarial, usually against another group of human beings. This fighting nature makes it difficult for us to be united. 

Every time the fighting nature is focused outwardly, at least relatively, there are still conflicts within. The invasion of Kuwait in 1990 was condemned around the world. A multi-national force was gathered to stop Saddam Hussein and prevent him from possibly invading Saudi Arabia. Even with evidence of the horrors that Hussein was committing it took months for the force to be assembled. Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990, it was not until January 1991, that the multi-national force actually began to push the Iraqi forces out of Kuwait. While this was happening, there were still demonstrations against the action; even after all the negotiations by the United Nations had failed, all the diplomatic solutions had failed. Those same demonstrations continued throughout the war, not that it lasted all that long.

We had a chance to unite when the COVID pandemic struck. Still there were arguments between nations about access to vaccines, who was going to do the research, who was going to fund the research, who was going to take the credit, who was going to receive the vaccines. This is not to mention all of the anti-vaccine, pandemic-deniers, and "freedom" seekers who were against the public health measures. Another chance for humanity to unite behind a cause, squandered by people's pet politics and personal biases and ignorance. The same which is still continuing even as I write.

Why are we divided? 

We must look at how we have been divided before we can look at why we are divided, for the how will tell us something of the why. First and foremost, when examining the human being, the first thing that divides us is sexuality, generally this is male and female, but there are also other labels which exist, transgender, for example is another label by which people are known. People are divided by the sexual organs which they possess, but the question of sexuality does not stop there.

In the question of sexuality there is also the question of attraction, to whom the individual is attracted which provides another point by which a person is divided and by which specific communities, and thus divisions are built. There is the emphasis in "normal" society of heteronormality in much of society which supposedly pushes other sexual orientations to the edge. Then other sexual orientations be they bisexual, homosexual, asexual or some other form of sexuality, form communities of their own where they believe their sexuality may be expressed freely. The building of such communities divides us.

We are supposedly divided by race. From one view, there is really one "race", the human race. This is a useful perspective as it unifies rather than divides, however the common approach to the concept is not so unifying a concept. The term race has weight politically and socially, and people will use this as a weapon to divide people to show how they are different. This word is most often tied into the word "racism" a weapon used from both sides. The word ethnicity, is a better description. Again, however, it is dividing people into groups, labelling them as different.

Tied in with ethnicity and race is history, a battleground to say the least especially when one examines the relationships between one some ethnicities and others. These histories are spot-highlighted not to identify those points where they worked together, but where they were divisive. The most often piece of history that will come up is colonialism and how indigenous peoples were treated. This is most often tied in with ethnicity or race.

Politics. Politics is can always be tied to history and ethnicity and it depends on which part of politics that a person wants to examine. Even within an ethnicity politics can divide a people. There are those who go for the right, there are those who go for the left, of politics; most often they do not find much middle ground in between. It only gets worse when it is the extreme of one or the other. Politics is often used by politicians to divide people so they can be controlled, and most people will let them.

Finally, on this list there is religion. This has been a point of division for as long as it has existed. It has been the cause of wars and acts of violence around the world, and still is today. The reason you don't hear about them is that they don't make a big enough impact in the media. Just because you are not looking doesn't mean it is not happening.

Our society is divided by these things and remains divided by these things even at the most important times. Black Lives Matter emphasised the division by race in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic and the problems of the division by race, among other things; there were issues within issues. We remain divided by issues of sexuality because there is an element of wanting to know what other people are doing, rather than allowing others privacy, and leaving other people to their way. Why does it matter what someone else is doing in their bedroom if you're not there, and not involved? The problem is that these divisions are perpetuated. 

Divisions perpetuated...

Conflicts are celebrated, or at least the victories of these conflicts are celebrated. These celebrations perpetuate the divisions between people. Battle of Adwa decisive battle of Ethiopia over Italian colonialism. Here we see a celebration of a battle between one ethnic group over another, the raising of an issue which is over a century old, celebrating the victory over colonialism. The same is seen in other parts of the world. The celebration of the Cinco de Mayo is the same, in this case it is the Mexican victory over the French, though many of the tourists who visit to celebrate the holiday have no idea what they are celebrating and are just joining in. The same can be said of many celebrations.

There is a big celebration in Australia which occurs every year, and every year it causes contention. That celebration is Australia Day, it was originally meant to celebrate the landing of the English in Australia; it has since become simply a celebration of being Australian in many Australian's eyes. For the indigenous population of Australia it is often referred to as "Invasion Day" due to the perceived celebration of the invasion of their native land. Once again, a celebration which marks a divisive element it society, though there has been ideas to change it. But there is obviously a division by ethnicity which is hard to close.

The issues in Australia are a problem, this is not to be denied. There is a process which needs to be followed and reconciliation which is required to mend the bridges, and some progress has been made. The issue is that there are elements who will perpetuate the differences, who will always claim that there is an issue, who will always claim there is more to be done. There is also the necessity of both sides to come together, to unite. If the problems are perpetuated, if there is no forgiveness in response to the apology, then there is no reconciliation and it will never end.

Poking the bear...

For some reason people enjoy provoking others to respond either to their side, or to show themselves as being against their position; this is primarily to start discussion, highlighting a particular cause. In some cases this is deliberate because they want to highlight the cause that they are passionate about, in other cases it is because they simply want to start discussion, because they enjoy discussion.

There is nothing wrong with lively discussion, even good reasoned argument, when those arguments turn nasty is when there are real problems and divisions are exposed. These divisions can be reduced by the two people agreeing to disagree, but most often they are not; both sides will pick their points and continue to argue their points until the division widens between them and there is a long way back to seeing that they have similarities as well as differences.

Issues should be raised, be they social or political, when they are appropriate, i.e. when they are relevant to the situation, but issues are often raised when a current situation has nothing to do with the  issue raised. A situation is sometimes turned to that particular person's political or social bend so they can highlight their particular social issue, to beat their drum about the social issue. This often causes more division than it does highlight the issue, especially when the issue was not of a concern to begin with; often it results in people being wary about what they speak about with that person, erecting walls, dividing once again.

These issues are often raised for one of two reasons, to make the person look important, to inject themselves into the situation and make themselves the centre of attention, or for making some political or social point. The last one is the most often case with politicians and activists, but it can also occur in normal life situations. Issues are raised just for the pure purpose of highlighting injustices done. Once again, due to the arguments that ensue such issues usually don't result in rational discussion but emotional argument dividing rather than uniting. 

All bad news?

Is it all bad news? Can we never be united? Is there never a time when we can be united, is it never possible for people to come together united? Is there no way?

What has been presented are the ways in which we are not united and the reasons that we have problems uniting. It comes down to a very simple problem; we are too busy looking for reasons that we are different to one another. These differences were presented at the beginning of this discussion. These differences do not acknowledge the things about us that are the same.

We are all human beings.

We all live on this planet.

We all breathe the same air.

We all deserve certain human rights (this one covers a lot of things).

We all have relatively short lives (in comparison to the length of history).

We all have dreams and aspirations.

We all laugh, cry, and smile.

We all have our good days, and our bad.

We all have days when we work hard, and others when we are lazy.

We all want to be well-liked.

Here are ten things that we all have in common. These are things which every human being on the planet shares with every other human being on the planet. If this is not a place to start uniting, then our future truly is bleak. Everyone feels small and helpless looking at the state of the world. You don't have to be a world leader to start the healing, start with a person you know. Talk to them, find commonality with them, acknowledge your differences, but also acknowledge where you are the same. Step outside find another person, do the same thing. Greet people on the street with a friendly smile, bring friendship to the stranger, treat the person in the shop with kindness; if everyone did these small acts all the time the world would be a much nicer place and people would realise they are more alike than they knew.

Cheers,

Henry.


P.S. You will notice a lot of Wikipedia links in my posts. This is a great resource of free information which is now reliably researched, as you will note by the references which appear at the bottom of each page. I donate to the Wikimedia Foundation monthly to keep this non-profit group operational, and I recommend that everyone do the same, you can do this HERE. Please give, and keep this free source of information alive, there are few of them these days.

Monday, 21 February 2022

A Splash of Colour: Actor Casting Priorities

 Greetings,

There has been a tendency in an effort to follow certain rules of "inclusivity" of late, to deliberately cast persons various lifestyles and ethnicities in particular roles in movies. In some cases it is simply adding a single representative member from each of these groups in the cast, even as characters to ensure that the movie or series is considered inclusive enough. I have referred to this in the title as "a splash of colour" because it is paying lip-service to inclusivity nothing more.

Word Use

A small note on wording, I am going to use the word ethnicity not race when referring to people of different colour or different cultural background, because it is the correct term to use. There is one race, the human race, we have multiple ethnicities within that race, and multiple cultures within those ethnicities. The more people realise that that they have more in common with one another, the easier it is that they will find ways to work together, so we need to find words to unite us, to take back words to unite us. Racism rolls off the tongue nicely, Ethnicism or ethnicitism does not. Lets kill the word, kill the idea. Make racism against humanity (as it is), not just against one group of humans.

From a Position of Privilege?

First there is going to be the complaint that I am a white male complaining about things in regard to race and sexuality so I am speaking from a position of "privilege" so I have no right to do so. Actually, I do because I watch movies and series, and because I am a human being. More to the point because I will be speaking from the perspective of a minority which often gets forgotten in these casting choices, and often played badly in movies and series, those with mental illness, and those with disabilities, but my discussion of the lack of representation of my minority, and its misrepresentation in movies will come later.

The Token Minority

How many movies and series have we seen of late where there has been the token person of colour, gay male, gay female, and so forth? In this case the casting directors have not chosen these individuals in the cases of those of a particular ethnicity because it was required for the role, but because they needed one to be representative. Or where characters were changed to be inclusive so alternate life-styles were present, and they grated against the original story, especially when they came from an original book or other source. These actions within the movie-making process are an attempt to appease some and make the movie more appealing to others.

Shouldn't the role go to the actor who is the best for the part, regardless what colour their skin happens to be? An example: in the original comic Nick Fury is white. In the Marvel movies he is was cast as Samuel L. Jackson, and he did an excellent job in the role; he suited the part. Jackson held the role, not because of the colour of his skin, but by the skill of his acting. Let the actor who is best suited to the role have the role, regardless of their ethnicity. In picking token roles for people of particular ethnic groups, they stand out more than if they were allowed to be cast and fill the roles like any other.

Misrepresented Minorities

The two minorities which are either misrepresented in movies, or are completely absent are those with disabilities, especially invisible disabilities, and those with mental illness. Yet, there are no great complaints about this misrepresentation, or lack of representation in movies or series. They seem to be swept underneath the carpet, pushed to one side, ignored at best, abused at worst.

Mental Illness

When mental illness is represented in movies there is one of three representations that is primarily present: criminally insane, military PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and socially inept. For the first group you have characters like The Riddler, Harley Quinn, The Joker, serial killers of different breeds and so forth. Mostly these people are presented as "insane" which has pushed them to be anti-social and criminal. The result of the way mental illness was played on the screen meant that people at large thought that schizophrenia and Multiple Personality Disorder were the same thing, which they are not. Next you have the military PTSD, which is a real problem in our society mind you. The soldier who has come home from war, or who is still in a war-zone, who experiences extreme "fight or flight" responses, or withdraws from society in general. There are aspects of PTSD that are seen in civilian life as well, usually as the result of abuse of some kind, but not always. The final group is the socially inept, Rain Man and Mercury Rising, both show two different perspectives of mental illness, but at an extreme end of the scale, so the individuals always have extreme difficulty dealing with society. These are extreme examples of these conditions, there are also other examples of both of these conditions, milder and with different symptoms. Yet, none of these, even the explanations, are completely representative of mental illness, only a single aspect of it within a single diagnosis. 

Disabilities

The first thing that someone will respond with is what about Professor. X? He's in a wheel-chair. Yes, played by a person who is perfectly able to walk, who does not have any idea about what it is like to really be stuck in that wheelchair every day of his life. There are a few notable actors with invisible disabilities, Morgan Freeman is one who has fibromyalgia, these are not represented on the screen. You don't see many movies with a person with a disability in movies. Ivar the Boneless is a classic character from "Vikings", born with a bone defect; are there any others even in the background with physical disabilities? Even as a result of battle? Yet, there is no great complaint about the lack of representation of disabilities being present on the screen, either big or small, even as extras. Well, let mine be the first voice of complaint. 

Tell the Story...

The focus of directors should be to put the best cast together so they can tell the best story that they can. They should allow their casting directors to find the actors who are most suitable to the roles which are present in the script, regardless of ethnicity or any other factor. If they need a particular ethnicity of an actor for a particular reason i.e. the movie is set in Africa, they need lots of darker skinned actors, then this should guide their choice. The important thing is to ensure that they have the actors to tell the story.

If a person is going to complain about "inclusivity" and have to ensure that all types of people are included and are represented, they should be at least represented properly, not some token splash of colour. My continued argument to these individuals would be to ensure that they would fight to include people with disabilities as well in their "inclusiveness" because people with disabilities, physical and mental are sure a minority as well. Most of us are happy to be a minority, because it would mean more sick people.

Remember, change the words and things will lose their power. I will reiterate again. There is one human race, there are many ethnicities and many cultures. The more we begin to change the narrative, and change the word, come together, show how we are the same not different, the harder it is to break us apart. A single stick may be easily broken, a bunch of sticks together is much more difficult to break.

Cheers,

Henry.