Monday, 5 July 2021

Australian Military History in Film

 Greetings,

There are lots of movies available which demonstrate the qualities of the soldier. There are fewer which discuss the qualities of the Australian soldier. The following primarily discusses two shows (one movie, the other a series) which are available on Netflix, at the time of writing, but is a discussion in general of much of Australia's early military history, or at least her military history to the end of World War II. These two shows highlight much of the Australian distrust of British command of Australian military forces in the later wars. It also highlights the weakness of the Australian Government to stand up to the British Government for the sake of its own military forces, and even the sake of itself.

Reviews

"Breaker Morant" is set toward the end of the Boer War (1899 - 1902) which took place in South Africa. It was essentially a struggle for independence fought between the British and the Boers, a white South African people of primarily Dutch stock. This was a war of insurrection according to the British Empire and was fought using guerrilla tactics. The Boers would organise themselves into groups or "commandos" and raid the British. This is, indeed where we get the name from.

The movie is a court-room drama which focuses on the courts-martials of Lieutenant Harry 'Breaker' Morant and two of his subordinates who were arrested for shooting Boer prisoners, and the killing of a German missionary. The movie takes place both in the court-room and also out on the veldt where the Morant's unit, the Bushveldt Carbineers, is seen in action, along with some other action.

"Gallipoli" is a multi-part mini-series which focuses on the Australian involvement in the Dardanelles Campaign in World War I. Rather than examining the battle from the position of the High Command or other leading or officer units, it tends to focus more on the man in the trenches, giving a very personal view of the war. 

The show does give some of the High Command perspective this shows in sharp contrast the lives of the enlisted man as compared to that of the officers, especially in High Command positions. It also shows the distinct difference in knowledge of what is assumed to be the ground as compared to what the actual ground and situation was like; none more so than the Australian 3rd Light Horse charge at the Nek. There is also an interesting perspective supplied when the war correspondents are introduced to the series and their perspectives of the battle are introduced.

The Origin of Australian Mistrust: The Australian Larrikin?

There are some who will claim that Australian mistrust of authority is the result of Australian nature. One of our most famous Australians is Ned Kelly an infamous bushranger, our people are well-known for being the people with the smile on the face, somewhat rebellious, and this it is sometimes accused because we originated as a penal colony. Indeed it has even been stated as such in the movie the "Princess Bride" that we were "peopled by criminals". From the perspective of our military there is a lot of reason that we have to mistrust authority, and especially British authority.

Bad Dealing

Just using the cases before us. Just using the cases presented in the movie "Breaker Morant" and the series "Gallipoli" there can be found examples of failures of trust being given, and extreme bad dealing on the part of the British with Australian military forces in both cases. It must be remembered that these two cases were less than a decade a part, easily within the lifetime of many of the men that served, and easily within the remembrance of many of the men that served. While the story may not have been publicised much in the papers, news of such occurrences do get out.

In the case of "Breaker Morant", two Australians were shot, and another was sent to prison as scapegoats to prove that the British could be impartial. This was so they could come bring the war to a close, this was nice for all of the men who were able to get home as a result, but expensive for the Australians who lost their lives, and ostensibly for doing their jobs. They were sent out to fight the Boers as they were being fought, and it wars this does tend to involve killing them. More of this will be discussed further along.

In the case of "Gallipoli", the British High Command looked at the maps they had before them and determined how the battles and the campaign would go. They had no knowledge of the actual ground they would be fighting on. Indeed, they failed to read the maps properly resulting in the Australians hitting ANZAC Cove which was supposed to be gently sloping, which was anything but that. The Australians simply forged on. There were also incidences where there were simply cases of bad orders from High Command where men were sacrificed for pointless objectives, and pointless assaults, the  Australian 3rd Light Horse assault on the Nek being a prime example.

"For the Empire"

In this period, that spans these two movies, and even beyond it, the Australian Government did not support its troops. It simply went along with what the High Command, and thus the British generals wanted, and so the British Government wanted. They Australian leadership simply followed along and did what was best "for the Empire" without any consideration for what was best for their own men.

There was little resistance offered to the trial of the Australians in "Breaker Morant" and what resistance was given was minimal. When telegrams of protest about the trial were sent to the Australian Government, they were ignored. When telegrams asking for intervention in regard to the orders for execution were sent, they were also ignored. Morant and Handcock were simply offered up to the British to be tried and executed.

There were Australian commanders present during the Gallipoli campaign, but they were under the orders of an over-reaching British command structure. British officers would command Australian commanders below them. British commanders would rarely command Australian troops, because aside from their rank, Australians would mostly ignore them. It was evident that Australian commanders had the concern for their troops in mind, but they were often hamstrung by the British higher up. The Australian Government refused to get involved, because they were "serving the Empire."

A similar situation occurred in World War II, when Australian troops were sent to the Middle East to fight the Germans and Italians (we have the movie "The Rats of Tobruk" showing an example of their courage). This was to protect the interests of the Empire. The Australian Government did not resist, even as the Japanese got closer and closer, invading Asian nations one by one, pushing the Americans back. This resulted in reserve troops, militiamen and conscripts of the 39th Battalion, men who did not qualify to serve in the 2nd AIF, having to be called up to defend Papua New Guinea as seen in the movie "Kokoda". Now, we defend other empires.

No Surprise

With the bad dealing and lack of support from their own government, it is of little surprise that the Australian soldiers stuck so well together, and do stick so well together; that there is a bond of friendship and camaraderie which lasts long after the rifle has been given back and the uniform put away; that the Australian soldier fights more for the man at his side than any other cause. The name "digger" was earned by the Australian troops during the Gallipoli campaign on some advice that they were given by a commanding officer, "Dig, dig, dig, until you are safe." With this sort of command, is there any surprise that the Australians had little faith in British leadership after Gallipoli, especially on the background of the "sacrifice" of Morant and Handcock.

There is an quote which comes from during the charge scene in "The Lighthorsemen", "Who do you think is shooting at us the Turks or the silly bloody British?" which somewhat summarises the attitude of the Australian soldier, light horse, or simple soldier to his British commander. They simply did not trust them or understand them, they thought command's job was simply to sacrifice the foot soldier so they could get more medals. The Australian soldier is one of the most respected soldiers in the world, ironically, the people who seemed to respect him least were his own people, in the form of his own government, and his own officers, especially the British. 

Cheers,

Henry.

Tuesday, 20 April 2021

It's the Journey Not the Destination

 Greetings,

I am going to get a little philosophical during this one, and I ask the reader to bear with me. I hope to identify something which has been rattling around in my mind for a little while that I think needs to be said. It identifies a problem in our fast-food, instant-solution, must have it now, culture which has developed over the more recent decades. People simply do not appreciate the benefits of simple things such as good long walks or drives to no particular destination. Nor do they appreciate stories which could have been solved with quick fixes.

Let me present a meme which I found using Google Image search, there is a link attached to the image for those of you who are interested, and in part the page to which it is linked demonstrates a lot of what I am discussing here. I could argue the point with many of their 25, but I will pick one that will cover much of it:



There are many memes and videos on YouTube and other places showing how the Lord of the Rings trilogy could have been shortened through the use of the eagles. Gandalf the Grey could have simply called one, allowed Frodo to mount the eagle, they could have flown over Mount Doom, tossed the ring in and presto, doom of the world averted. The life of Boromir would have been saved as a result, along with a long cast of other characters.

Now the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, and I am not including the Hobbit, for those who want to pick at that point is some 481,103 words long. It is a rather long read, and it does have its points where there is slow going and a little hard to read. The movies by Peter Jackson, 3 hours plus, depending on which version you watch, are an epic watch in themselves, and they miss parts of the story out. So maybe a shortened version would be nice, but who would be the person to pick which bits you would take out, and then stand against all the complaints that would inevitably follow.

But, would the crisis have truly totally been averted? Sauron may have given agency and instruction to Saurman to build his army of Uruk-hai, but the threat was still present, threatening Rohan. What about the attacks that were already occurring here? What about the threat of the hill tribes? What about the jealousy that already existed between Rohan and Gondor? We have seen in our world how jealousy leads to war, why should we think that the Men of the West would be any different?

What about the development of characters along the way? Gandalf would have remained "the Grey" never having slain the Balrog. Aragorn would not become King, the world of men would remain disunited, separate, squabbling among one another, prime victims for any other crisis that may come along to threaten Middle Earth, and there is always a next crisis. If history has told us anything, there is always another crisis just below the horizon.

I mean, there is also the development of other characters to consider. Frodo had the hardest journey of all, and the prime focus is always on him and his resistance to the One Ring. There is also the split personality of Gollum which is contended with, these often overshadow the development of other characters. The growing friendship between two individuals who formerly would not have considered each other friends at all in Legolas and Gimli. Then there is the growing courage, or the realisation of his true courage in Samwise Gamgee, who follows Frodo to the bitter end, who realises his love for the simple life, and courage in all things. There is also the development of Pippin Took, who starts as a fool and develops courage and responsibility by the end, and his friend Merriadoc Brandibuck who discovers courage in the end fighting for those he loves. All of these things would not have happened if the journey had not taken place, if each event in their lives had not taken place.

In the immortal words of the band Tism, "Its the horse not the horseshit." The horseshit in this case truly is the destination, the result. It may be good for fertiliser, again another journey, but I think more people are interested in the horse. We must look at stories, like Lord of the Rings, and the Hobbit, and others as taking us on a journey. We follow the characters through their trials and tribulations, watching them develop and grow. If we were only interested in the destination, we would only read the last chapter of each novel that we pick up, but we don't we take the book in hand and read each chapter in turn.

It bothers me a little that there are so many of the memes and YouTube clips showing how the Lord of the Rings could have been ended more quickly. I think that the people who present these memes and videos have missed the point of the story, they do not understand the greater qualities of the story that has been presented before them. The greater depth of character that is shown in the characters within the story and how they develop along the way. I think that they are too addicted in seeing the result as soon as possible missing the point of the journey.

Appreciate the journey that the author or director takes you on, watch as the characters go through different circumstances and develop. Think about the journeys that you have been on and how they have changed you. Take time to enjoy the journey that you are on, every journey that you participate in, each one is a chance to develop your character and to learn something about yourself. Don't be too eager for the destination, you may miss something special in between.

Cheers,

Henry.

Saturday, 23 January 2021

One Day Causes and One Day Politics

 Greetings,

So, Australia Day is upon us again, as per usual there is the protest about how Australia's indigenous people have been treated in the past. It should not be doubted that I think that they were treated poorly in the past, they were. Native peoples were treated poorly by colonial powers as a rule rather than an exception and this is seen throughout the world. Some were treated worse than others, but this is not the time nor the place to make comparison. This is an examination of the current protests, and protests in general, and their sustainability. Or more to the point, those who participate in them on a populist basis...

Why is that one day a year people feel that they can get all cross about how people have been treated, because it happens to be a particular celebration that day, yet they do nothing about the same cause for the rest of the year? I find this particularly populist and weak. We find this with many political issues and many causes. People will get on the bandwagon while it is popular, but as soon as it is out of the public eye, i.e. off the media, or finished for that particular day, then they stop making their complaints and demonstrations. This can be seen with many different political issues and many different causes.

I will cite a few causes to begin with... first let us begin with, the big one, Climate Change. This one seems to be on people's minds whenever there is a Climate Change Summit, or some government makes some decision about which way they are going on some paper, but then it dies down pretty quickly again. So, this one affects the entire planet. Yet, there is little said about it on a regular basis, only when the media picks up on some story and spreads it around the world for people to get agitated. So this one is left to the dedicated people, and us to recycle as we do normally.

Terrorism. Another global phenomenon. So everyone thinks that because COVID-19 has struck that the terrorists are all going to go back into hiding and give everyone a break? The extremists in countries are just going to put down their weapons? No, sorry, doesn't work like that. Even when the cameras are not pointed at the latest terrorist incident, they are still occurring. People don't get to hear about the thousands of terrorist incidents which happen in countries because they don't involve the right people, so there is no media coverage. Is anyone voicing protest about these incidents? Campaigning for their right to live in peace? 

Black Lives Matter. Months ago you could not go on social media without seeing posts about the horrid way people of colour were being treated by the law enforcement agencies in the United States. This spread all over the world, there was nowhere you could escape it. Now, you see the occasional bumper sticker, if you manage to get outside. The occasional post on social media, but this has died down. Not popular any more, who is doing anything about it?

Gun Control. One that always stirs the pot. There is a shooting at a shopping mall, or mostly at a school, mostly in the United States that gets screened around the world, thanks to the internet and the media, and people start looking at gun violence. Then they start trying to compare their own gun control laws with the United States. This one only rears its head when some person shoots lots of people. Other than that it is not popular enough, so who bothers?

Income Gap. Not as sexy as all the rest so it rarely gets media time. The media still has the policy, "If it bleeds, it leads." There is still an income gap, and it is only getting worse. The gap between the rich and the poor is not a gap it is a trench and it gets wider and wider and the politicians do not want to know, "In Australia there is no official measurement of the extent of poverty." (Parliament of Australia) Where is the fight and protest for them? Where is the argument for these people? Where is the action?

These are five causes which have been pointed out, all of which are current. Yet there is no media coverage. There is no social media coverage for them. There is only what is popular to complain or be offended about today, depending on what celebration day it is. If people were serious they would continue their protest beyond the single day causes, beyond the popular protest, beyond the popular media coverage and make it part of their lives, take political action, but most don't and most won't. This is the problem with the world. People care only when it is convenient and when it is popular, then it is forgotten. Words are cheap. When action is asked, then you find out who cares. There are a lot of keyboard warriors out there, few real ones.

Cheers,

Henry.

Sunday, 8 November 2020

Movie Military Fight-Off: United States Colonial Marines Versus Mobile Infantry

 Greetings,

For a bit of fun, for a change I decided that I would do a comparison between the United States Colonial Marines of "Aliens" (i.e. the second movie) and the Mobile Infantry of "Starship Troopers". Now, before any more discussion is made, it is the movies which is being discussed in regard to "Starship Troopers" not the book by Robert Heinlein, there are quite a few significant differences between them, as will be pointed out. 

There will be a general comparison of weapons and gear between the two military units which the discussion is focused upon, followed by tactics, then an examination of the opponents, and finally a comparison of their ideology. Hopefully, by the end, an idea of the preferable unit that a person would want supporting them if they had to make the choice will be presented.

Not the Book

There is a distinct difference between the Mobile Infantry of the book Starship Troopers and the movie "Starship Troopers". The first big clue is that in the book they are supposed to be wearing large, powered, armoured suits which bound across the battle field using short bursts of thrusters. Hence the phrase "On the bounce" which gets referred to throughout the franchise. These armoured suits have different weapon systems mounted on them. The troopers in the movie are not in such suits indeed they have barely more than military units have in our present military. Only "Starship Troopers 3: Marauder" comes close with the powered suits which feature in the end of that movie. So a different Mobile Infantry is being discussed here, the movie/s not the book.

Gear and Weapons

In the comparison of gear and weapons, the load-out between the standard CM (Colonial Marine) and MI (Mobile Infantry) troopers is similar. Both have helmets, both have body armour of some sort. Both have an automatic weapon. In the case of the CM the M41A Pulse Rifle has an under-slung grenade launcher; for the MI cap trooper, the Morita Assault Rifle started out with an under-slung shot gun, and then progressed to an under-slung grenade launcher in the later movies in the Morita III Assault Rifle.

Various technical gear for communications was available to both CM and MI forces along with support weapons and so forth. The MI even had tactical nuclear weapons at their disposal, but similar high-grade weapons are also mentioned in "Aliens" as well. This results in a pretty even match between the two forces in the initial parts. Only when the MI gains access to powered armour suits with weapons built into them do the MI significantly pull ahead in terms of gear available.

Tactics

In both cases, the units of both forces seem somewhat "disposable," being sent in with little support should they encounter real trouble. The MI has to rely on the Navy for pick-up from a hot-zone, and the CM has to rely on its pilots or wait an extended period of time before pick-up is available. In both cases the mortality rate in both units is quite high.

The MI in the early part of the films work as large units in multiple waves this is seen at work in the Battle of Klendathu, which fails. Shortly after there are smaller units used, with some success, but these smaller unit tactics really do not work particularly well and are never really as small as those found in the CM until access to powered armour suits is gained. Then overwhelming fire-power is used to shift the balance in their favour. Their tactics remain rudimentary throughout the movies.

The CM as seen in "Aliens" use small-unit tactics, sending in only two squads for the operation on LV-426. There is clearly two units by the doubling of equipment, all under the command of a single officer, who is clearly inexperienced. This inexperience and lack of camaraderie reduces the morale of the troops significantly and affects their ability to work as a team especially under stressful situations. This results in the deaths of troopers. Their tactics are better developed but the inexperience of their command hampers its effectiveness. A real, experienced, officer might push the CM ahead in this area, though battlefield knowledge is difficult to beat. 

The Opponents

The CM face off against the Xenomorphs i.e. Aliens; the MI against the Arachnids. Both are of alien origin the former's home is unknown while the Arachnids originate from Klendathu. Both are hive creatures and work together for the species rather than the individual. This is most evident for the Xenomorphs in "Alien: Resurrection" where the weaker is sacrificed to escape from their cell. Both are more aptly controlled by a hive mind, the Queen in the case of the Xenomorphs and the Brain in the case of the Arachnids. Both standard forms prefer hand-to-hand combat and are vicious. The Xenomorphs, however, will capture some of their victims so they can grow new ones.

The Xenomorph is quick, preferring speed and stealth to frontal attacks. While it does have a certain amount of protection in its skin, its ability to make quick attacks is its best defence. It also has acid for blood which encourages its opponents not to kill it as well. The Arachnid on the other hand is hardened, having a hard shell and damaging mouth and limbs. It has only a very small spot where it is particularly vulnerable, its preferred method is to attack in waves, overwhelming its opponents with sheer numbers. 

The opponent that a person faces, especially where it is species versus species will determine what weapons, defences and tactics the person will choose to best go against it. This can explain some of the differences in approach, tactics and load-outs between the Colonial Marines and the Mobile Infantry. Neither of these foes would be particularly pleasant to face.

Ideology

The final part of the comparison is to compare the ideology of the two units. To compare some of the society upon which they are based to see which mind-set benefits their fight the best. This will address some sensitive issues, but must be performed in a systematic and scientific way. 

The world of the Colonial Marines is much the same as it is today except corporations have become stronger, capitalism is clearly still in full swing with the almighty dollar still ruling all the most important decisions. Weyland-Yutani is what they would call a mega-corporation owning vast assets and having interests in many different areas. It is actually on their recommendation that the colony is built and due to one of their executives that the Xenomorphs invade the colony. It could even be implied that it is by their influence that the Colonial Marines are sent.

Once the CM of the movie are introduced, it is clear that some are there for a term and a pay-cheque, not because they actually believe in what they are doing. Their structure is upon similar grounds to 18th century armies where the officers are a class different from enlisted men and so are often inexperienced. This affects the morale of the group, only made worse by individuals who are only there because they get paid. It is evident as the group starts to break down as soon as things do not go their way. This affects the morale of the group overall.

Some would claim that the world of "Starship Troopers" is a military dictatorship where only the veterans who have served are considered citizens of the Federation. What will be noted is that there is still a lot of difference in occupation and still a spread of wealth amongst those who are not citizens. A capitalist society seems to be operating with rich and poor. Further, there is evidence that there is still some sort of voting present, even if it is for citizens only. It is not to defend the way of life which is presented, but people choose to serve the Federation and become citizens. Obviously what is seen is only a slice of the civilization, but the same can be said for both movies.

In the MI the best are elevated to positions of authority, in some situations, especially on the ground, this is due to survival. This is especially the case for the later operations. It means that the officers actually know what is going on and know something of the enemy. Further the MI candidates chose to serve the Federation and once the 'Bug War' began they are fighting for their species, not for a pay-cheque. This gives them an edge in terms of morale and the ability to push through difficult situations. Respect is given to those 'on the ground' more than those who are not.

Conclusion

From the pure perspective of what has been presented here, the Mobile Infantry as depicted in "Starship Troopers", even though it suffers mass casualties in many of its battles, and is often left in situations where it is outnumbered and outgunned, has the advantage over the United States Colonial Marines of "Aliens". The prime area where they have this advantage is in ideology. A person who believes in a fight, is more likely to fight harder. If each trooper believes in the next trooper, it increases unit cohesion, and increases morale. Morale is especially important when the unit is outnumbered by the enemy.

The USCM have a slight edge to begin with in regard to tactics, but these are difficult to truly implement when the platoon leader is a) not on the ground with the troops, b) is inexperienced in actual combat situations, and c) thinks themselves to be above their troopers and apart from them. This is an issue which is not present amongst all but the highest of military officers in the MI. As far as equipment goes, what is available to the standard trooper is very similar between both groups, so much so that there is no comparison, except in the later movies for "Starship Troopers".

Overall, it is a win to the Mobile Infantry of "Starship Troopers"

Thursday, 2 July 2020

On "Stupid" Questions

Greetings,

The following is more of a formal discussion about the subject of "stupid" questions. This was based on a conversation that I had with a friend about training and the questions that students asked. I felt that it was important that students were free to ask all the questions that they had, thus denied the position of the "stupid" question. Here, I present, a more formal discussion of such. This is quite long (about 10,000 words)

Cheers,

Henry.

TL:DR: Carl Sagan said: "There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand the world. There is no such thing as a dumb question". Questions need to be encouraged. Most of the fear about asking questions comes from our past. There can be greater problems created if you don't ask the question. You will most likely be not alone in not knowing the answer to the question. Questions allow people and groups to learn and grow. 

Abstract

          The concept of a “stupid” question is one found in common language and Western culture. These are questions which are asked, often resulting in rebukes or the asker being ridiculed for asking the question. These questions often relate to group knowledge which supposedly is common amongst the group, so the question is seen as needless. The following discussion argues that such is not the case and that the so-called “stupid” question is actually a contradiction. All questions should be treated with respect because they are an individual’s search for knowledge. Further there is evidence that the asking of questions furthers knowledge and that not asking questions can lead to problems and mistakes. Asking questions should be encouraged.

Introduction

          The “stupid” question is one a person is not supposed to ask because they should already know the answer, or because it will make the person look stupid for asking it, likely for the same reason. A question is used to search for answers, and thus search for knowledge so the question must be asked, how such a search could ever be stupid. The discussion which follows addresses the concept of the “stupid” question and presents ideas and concepts contrary to its existence.
          So the reader and the author are familiar with the terms and have a similar understanding of the terms to begin with, both the terms “stupid” and “question”, which comprise the concept, will be addressed. Once they have been addressed individually, they will be then addressed united as “stupid question” to give a beginning position for the discussion.
          What follows next is a discussion of how the “stupid” question which was asked in our past affects the questions which are asked, or not asked, in our present and our future. This is due to the result gained from asking the question in our past and our learned experienced from asking that question, and others like it. This is learned experience and practice.
          The result of this learned experience and practice is fear. It is fear of how others will perceive us, primarily as a result of group dynamics and the psychology of asking the question. This fear is a learned response gained from our past then affecting our present and our future, the result being that questions are not asked because of fear. This is even when there are questions that need to be answered.
          The problem created is that questions are not answered due to fear of what others will think, so people go blindly into things, making mistakes as they do so. These are mistakes which could have been averted if questions had been asked before they had started, questions which would have given them knowledge in their answering and resulted in fewer mistakes; mistakes which are costly.
          Ask the question. Find out the information regardless of how “stupid” the question might seem. Questions should be encouraged because it is through questions that people find knowledge and can do things in the right way and avoid mistakes. Questions should be encouraged in groups and teams of people the more knowledgeable the group the better. There will be respect for the question, just remember that timing the question is also important.
          Through the answering of questions comes learning; finding out information through the questions which are asked. Every question which is asked gives information so has value to the asker of the question. If the question is not asked then learning is denied, likely not only to the asker, but also to the whole group.
          Often the question which is asked by one person will be one which another person has in a group. This means that asking questions benefits the group. Everyone will not have the same knowledge and perspective and questions allow this to be achieved. To maximise the effectiveness of a team or group, group dynamics and psychology both need to be taken into account, so they can be harnessed to the group’s advantage.
          Members of the group should be encouraged to give feedback to the leader of the group. In the case of a teaching situation, it helps when the teacher asks for feedback from the students, but it also helps when the students volunteer the feedback in the form of active listening. This is the same with all group situations. Feedback can allow content to be changed, modified, or repeated so that people understand it better.
          The “stupid” question is a concept which is often defined in very general terms and in terms as information that “everyone” knows. This implies that everyone has the same sort of background knowledge and learning in a group, also that they all come from the same cultural background. Questions seek knowledge so the concept of the “stupid” question argues that such seeking is also “stupid”. Each question is valid and should be addressed with the same level of attention regardless.

Definitions

          The definitions for the two main words in the discussion “stupid”[1] and “question” were defined using three different dictionaries, the Merriam-Webster (2020), Dictionary.com (2020) and Wiktionary (2020). It should be noted that the same three dictionaries were used for defining both words so there can be no contention that the dictionary may have defined the term differently. The only change to the definitions is that the examples given in the definitions have been removed. These definitions from these sources, edited as previously indicated, can be found in Appendix 1: Definitions. From these three definitions, an analysis of the definitions was performed to pull together the common elements of the three definitions to form a single, conglomerate, definition of each word. The analysis of the definitions can be found in Appendix 2: Analysis.
After analysis, Merriam-Webster (2020a) defines “stupid” as being unintelligent or indicating an unintelligent act, further that such comes from a lack of reasoning or thinking.[2] The Dictionary.com (2020a) definition focuses on slowness/dullness of mind, foolishness, pointlessness, lack of meaning or sense. This again relates to a lack of reasoning or thinking.[3] The Wiktionary (2020a) definition focuses on a lack of intelligence or exhibiting a lack of intelligence, thus is quite narrow and shows why the broader search is most useful.[4]
          The final definition of “stupid” should thus take in the main themes which have been presented by these three definitions. The prime one is it originates from a lack of reasoning or thinking. The aspect of lack of intelligence or the exhibition of lack of intelligence is a part of this, but it is the lack of reasoning which is most important to the definition here. The result is that as a result of analysis, “stupid” will be defined as indicating something unintelligent or one which has a lack of reasoned thinking. This is more suitable to the purpose of this enquiry considering a type of question.
          After analysis, Merriam-Webster (2020) defines a “question” as an act or instance of asking.[5] Dictionary.com (2020) defines it as a request for information.[6] The Wiktionary (2020) definition focuses on request for information or a challenge to the accuracy or a matter.[7]
          There is a clear theme in the definition of “question” of a request for information. In all cases the definition points to a request by the asker for information. The definition of “question” will thus result as an act or instance of asking for information. This is the most suitable definition as it pertains to the issue which is being addressed.
          There are two definitions, one each for “stupid” and “question” which have been presented as a result of the analysis of the definitions given by three different sources. These definitions have been deliberately focused toward what is most useful and poignant to the discussion. These are the definitions which are used as the discussion proceeds. Such definitions are vital to ensure that both the author and reader understand these words in the same manner.
          If a person is to examine the phrase “stupid question” in the light of these definitions it results in a contradictory statement being “an act or instance of asking for information which is described as an unintelligent act or one which has a lack of reasoned thinking”. This is because “stupid” describes the type of “question”. This supposes that an act of asking for information can be unintelligent or lacking in reasoned thinking, which, in its essence, a question requires. In this use of logic, only using the definitions of the words, they are contradictory, but this is only in theory. The “stupid” question, in reality, lurks in our past like some sort of nemesis.

Past


“I'm sure all of us can remember a time when we were younger and we asked a "stupid question," and got made fun of for it. And although we didn't realize it at the time, we internalized that feeling and learned not to do it again.”[8]

          Our past informs our present and our future, the lesson that was learnt from asking a question and having the negative reaction from those around us was, that it was wrong to ask certain types of question, that questions need to be thought about before we asked them, and some hesitance was needed before questions were asked. This results in people not asking questions for fear of them looking stupid or because they might ask a question which might be stupid, so questions do not get asked at all. What we do not know is that by asking what might seem to be the simple question, we could help those around us.

“"(There's) no such thing as a stupid question" is a popular phrase with a long history. It suggests that the quest for knowledge includes failure, and that just because one person may know less than others they should not be afraid to ask rather than pretend they already know. In many cases multiple people may not know, but are too afraid to ask the "stupid question"; the one who asks the question may in fact be doing a service to those around them.”[9]

          Asking questions is ruled by fear, due to the response the asker may gain from asking the question. While the question may be a true seeking of knowledge, there is still fear that a negative response will result from the question. We are encouraged to ask questions as children, never more so than in the classroom. Even here, the nemesis of the “stupid question” exists even though it supposedly does not. Outside, this rule does not necessarily apply, “The concept of asking “stupid questions” doesn’t always resonate outside of the classroom.”[10]
          People who ask these questions outside the classroom, especially in the workplace, are often met with derision, as it is frequently assumed that the answer to the question is already known by the assembled group, though this may not always be the case; even if members of the assembled group who did not know would not admit it. “Stupid questions” are seen as wasting the valuable time of supervisors, superiors and other co-workers in many work settings, and even in social settings the same derision can often result. The questioning culture of the classroom seems to stop once it reaches the “real” world.

“Breaking into the Game Industry argues that the adage (and the related one "the only stupid question is the one that is never asked") is only relevant for the classroom, and that in the real world when you want to try to impress someone, there are many stupid questions one can ask.”[11]

          With this fear of the result of asking the wrong question, or indeed asking any question at all in some instances, it is not surprising that people do not ask questions even when they are invited to. The fear established early in childhood has flowed through to adulthood and remains until it is clearly demonstrated that the situation has changed. It must be proven that questions are not only allowable, but encouraged. Through this investigation it will be shown that so-called “stupid questions” are a matter of valuation and should not exist. The primary cause for this is that in asking a question the individual seeks an answer to their question. What prevents the asking is fear.



Fear


“We’ve all been there: you’re in a meeting, conference, or lecture, and you’re completely lost. You have a question, but you don’t speak up. Why? Because you’re afraid of looking dumb.”[12]

          No one else is asking a question, so you should know the answer, right? You are afraid of looking like you do not know as much as everyone else, like you have not done your research, or at least as much as everyone else. This is the fear that prevents people from asking important questions. It is the fear of what others will think of us.

“We’ve all hesitated to ask something, fearing that others will find our question stupid. Staying quiet may seem like the safe option – but in all likelihood you’ll eventually regret it.”[13]

          Fear of asking a “stupid” question prevents people from asking questions which would give answers that they are searching for, and sometimes gives them the keys to the knowledge they are looking for. This fear attached to looking foolish or stupid in front of a group is pervasive and powerful, but it is something that needs to be fought in search of answers.

“Society would be in a better place if we were less fearful of looking ignorant in the face of knowledge. Allow yourself to be curious and ask your questions. If someone makes fun of your question – ask someone else. If you get a good answer, great. You will have learnt something you didn’t know – say thank you to your temporary teacher.”[14]

          If you knew, you would not be asking the question. The fear of looking ignorant in the face of knowledge is something to fight against. Stand and ask the question, gain the knowledge, if you get rebuked for your question, go elsewhere and ask somewhere else. When you get an answer thank the person who gave you the answer, they are giving you knowledge. Ask the question, indeed always ask the question, forget the fear and ask the question to gain the knowledge. Having the knowledge helps prevent future problems.



Problem


“You’ve been there. A question sits on the tip of your tongue but you just can’t, no you won’t, ask it. Pushing back questions that surface in your consciousness is equivalent to painting over mildew. It might take the problem off your mind for a short while, but you have not addressed the underlying issue.”[15]

          Everyone has been there. A question sits there in the back of your mind, it needs to be asked, but you don’t ask it for fear that you will look stupid in front of the group. You don’t follow it up with the leader or teacher, and the subject keeps rearing its head. It would have been easier, in the first place, to get over the fear and ask the question. Likely the same gap in your knowledge has caused issues until the information was found. Here, not asking the “stupid” question is a problem.

“History is full of examples of failed projects and fatal accidents that could have been prevented if only the person in charge had been challenged by their team and had listened.”[16]

          Assumptions are a problem. Leaders assume that their groups or teams understand where a project is headed and what is required to complete this project. If no one asks the questions that are relevant, these assumptions remain, even if they are wrong. The result is that the project heads in the wrong direction, time and money are wasted, and sometimes there are costly mistakes which are made; all because someone did not ask a “stupid” question.
          Bravery is required to stand up, to be highlighted, to ask that question, but in the end it could be exactly what the group needs. “What are the alternatives? Keep your mouth shut, assume, miss a crucial point, go off on a tangent, and build a house of cards.”[17] Questions need to be asked so that problems can be highlighted, differences in approach can be highlighted, and elementary issues which may have been overlooked can be highlighted. Problems can be solved early.

Prevention of Problems


“it doesn’t cause problems it helps prevent them, it doesn’t get in the way, it shows the way. Far from undermining the leader it gives them the chance to bring everyone onto the same page.”[18]

          Some will think that questions slow things down, especially when they are simple questions that “everyone should know”. If the question is being asked, “everyone” does not know. These “stupid” questions are a way that people can affirm that people in a group understand the foundational elements of a project the same way; a way that a group can ensure that everyone understands the theory or essential practical elements the same way. These “stupid” questions are problem-solvers rather than problem-creators.

“just as a reminder, that single “stupid” question could very well mean the difference between a satisfied customer and a waste of time, money, motivation, and good ideas.”[19]

Ask the Question


“One of the best things about coming into your own as a scientist is that you learn to let go of the shame that society often attaches to not knowing something. As a scientist, it is not the “not knowing” that bothers me. It is not wanting to fix that lack of knowledge that bothers me. I don’t know the answers to many things – but if I meet someone who might know the answer, I will certainly ask.”[20]

          Asking the question is important because it avails you of knowledge. Only in asking a question about a topic which you do not know, do you gain knowledge. Even when the question would seem to be “stupid” for some reason asking the question and gaining the answer gains you knowledge in the process, not asking the question results in you not getting answers and therefore possibly lacking essential knowledge and this is a problem. The key here is, ask the question to get the answers.

Get Answers


“I’m here to tell you DON’T DO IT. Find a way to get over, past, or around whatever hesitation is causing you to hit your internal pause button. Ask your question. And don’t just ask it, ask it until it is answered and your internal gut check comes back positive for comfort.”[21]

          Don’t hold off because you feel like your question is “stupid”, ask the question and get the answers to the question until you are comfortable with the answers. The hesitation that you are feeling, the fear and anxiety, is less important that gaining the answer to the question. In the end, you will be more comfortable with having the answer to the question you have.
Gaining the answer is especially important where you can’t find the answer yourself. “But I’m telling you if you have a question and if you’ve done your homework, the worse thing you can do is let it go unanswered.”[22] The answer to this question could result in whether or not a project succeeds, whether or not the work that you put into something or the approach you take is wasted or not.
Do not be concerned about the question, thinking of a “good” question, and phrasing it correctly so it sounds better “You don’t have to think of a “good question”, just ask the questions that are on your mind.”[23] The image that you project by asking a question is less important than the information you are seeking. The image which should be perceived is of a person seeking information, nothing more. Image is even more, or actually less, important if you are a leader, or a teacher, you must lead by example.

“True leaders worry less about how they are perceived in the short-term and more about actionable results in the long-term. Ask your questions; probe until you get answers.”[24]

          The leader must demonstrate to his team that asking questions is supported; the teacher must do the same for their students. In both cases the individual must put aside how they look in the short-term; the advantage of demonstrating that questions are supported is to the advantage of the group or team. If a question makes you look anything negative, this is overshadowed by the advantages of understanding due to the answers you gain in the long-term. Ask the questions until the answers are found.
There are reasons that such so-called “stupid” questions might be asked, reasons that further information might be required to gain a full answer to the question which has been asked, or further questions.

·       “Maybe you asked it already and got an answer (but you aren’t satisfied).
·       Maybe you feel you should know the answer (but you don’t).
·       Maybe you think everyone else understands what was said (they probably don’t).”[25]

In each case there is more information that is required to fulfil the requirements of information to answer the question. Only through complete answers can you understand the reason for things to happen, the way that they happen. Maybe as a result of this process a different direction is taken, the question should always be respected.

Respect for the Question


“If you sincerely have a question, and have gone to the trouble of articulating it, most scientists will respect the question and the curiosity that has prompted to ask it. They will generally answer it as well as they can.”[26]

          The statement above should be the same for anyone whom you ask a question. The question should be answered in a manner which is complete and given due respect to the question which is asked. Experts in the field will be asked similar questions, and that is fine. They will answer these questions as it affirms the direction that they are taking. The important thing is that experts want questions to greater understand what they are studying. Questions are encouraged by all.

“On a cautionary note – not every scientist is always going to be in the mood to answer questions about their work. If we are hunkered over a computer, typing furiously, with headphones in, it is probably not a good time.”[27]

          There is always a question of timing in regard to questions regardless whether they are so-called “good” questions or “stupid” questions. If the person who you want to ask the question is busy, you are not likely to get the positive response to your question that you might like. It is not that the question is bad or that they are not willing to answer the question, it is just that the timing is bad and that they are focussed on other things.
Questions are better timed when the person you want to ask the question is not busy. This is especially the case if the answer is going to be long and involved, such a question may be deferred to another time. This also goes for the way that the question is asked. If the question is asked in an accusing manner then the response is likely to be defensive and abrupt. Questions should be encouraged, but their timing and manner of asking should also be considered.

Encourage

          In a work or social situation, or any situation where there is a group, if a leader wants the group to do something, then there needs to be some encouragement to do the particular thing. This is the same for asking questions, all questions. For the leaders of the group it is necessary that they show the group how, by asking the questions themselves.

“Encourage others to ask questions by asking questions yourself.

A huge part of leadership is showing that you are, and continue to be, open to learning. You want others around you to feel like it's safe for them to ask questions, talk through mistakes, and collaborate with other team members. You can tell people to do this until you're blue in the face, but employees learn best by watching and seeing it in action. So if you want to foster an environment where people can ask questions without feeling stupid, then you need to show them how.”[28]

          In leading a group, there may not be many opportunities for a leader to ask questions, but the leader, to encourage the group to ask questions, should take these opportunities whenever they are present. This is especially important for the simplest questions and those which would seem to be “stupid”. Questions need to be encouraged so the group as a whole can learn and foundations of knowledge can be established.
The common basis of knowledge is essential in any group for moving forward and can save trouble later on in regard to projects. This is established by people in the group asking questions to gain knowledge. “Ask – and encourage others to ask – stupid questions because they have the magical ability to save you from a lot of trouble later on.”[29] Questions from members of the group establish what the group does and does not know. Assumptions made in the early stages of a project or training program can cause issues if the group does not all know foundational information or understand the purpose of the project or training project. Such assumptions are confirmed or denied as a result of questions from the group.

“Encouraging team members to question, clarify and challenge will help prevent problems, create new and better solutions and gives the leader the chance to bring the team together.”[30]

Results


“If you don’t ask the stupid questions, you’ll never know. Ask them, and you’ll be opening up a box of wisdom that everyone else round the table will appreciate. You win logic and their respect.”[31]

          The result of not asking the question is that the information will not be given and you will not know the answer to the question. You may be missing out on an opportunity to widen your world and learn more. The result of asking the so-called “stupid” question and you will find a lot of information which was assumed and often not known by a people. People will thank you for having the courage to ask the question and you will gain respect for asking the question.
          The opening of knowledge is the greatest asset that asking questions can gain. “Great solutions and insights often start with someone having the guts to ask a 'dumb' question.”[32] A different approach can be gained from a new insight from a person asking the basic questions that no one is willing to ask because they seem “stupid”. Questions along this line of reasoning can open areas of thought and different approaches due to the questions made. Always ask the question, the results might be surprising.

Learning

          We ask questions because we want to know things, to gain knowledge. Each question asked is a quest to find a piece of knowledge, sometimes it is for an immediate purpose, and sometimes it is for a future goal. If the question is not asked then the individual has lost an opportunity to learn and to grow.

“I have been in plenty of situations where someone has said something, and instead of asking them to explain or clarify what they'd said so that I could learn, I would let it pass because I didn't want to sound stupid. On an individual level, this is counterproductive because it prohibits personal growth.”[33]

          We need to look past any chance of personal embarrassment that a supposed “stupid” question may result in and look toward the learning that the resulting answer will give us. To hold back a question is to hold back a chance to learn. It happens because of fear due to our past, because of the result of previous questions in which have been demeaned by the people who have been asked or those around us that has resulted in fear. The important thing to learn is that all questions have value.

Questions have Value


“Every question has value -- even so-called dumb questions. In an organization as complicated as Scribe, we encourage everyone to ask questions all the time. It’s the best way to ensure everyone understands what we’re doing.”[34]

          Regardless of the situation, in a group there will be different levels of intelligence and understanding of a situation. The only way that everyone in the group is going to be put on the same level of understanding with the same amount of information to hand is to have questions answered by those who do not have the information. This will make the group more effective at whatever it is doing. Even in a school where the prime aim is individual learning; there will be a time where there will be partnered tests or skills. If both the partners are not on the same level as each other, there will be problems. As a leader of a group it is important to show that asking questions are valid.

“Take the time to explain what happens if clarity is not achieved.

So, as soon as possible, show people it's OK to ask for clarification.”[35]

          Leaders need to demonstrate to their organisations, groups, or social settings that it is good to ask questions, that it is encouraged. These questions need to demonstrate that they are to the benefit of the group because they put everyone on the same level and assist in mutual understanding. They allow the finding of things which people did not even know were there.

Finding


“From a seemingly dumb question, we learned about a problem that we didn’t even know existed (and something about the Ops Coordinator). That’s the value of creating a culture where anyone can ask any question.”[36]

          So-called “stupid” questions can find holes in mutual understanding; indeed they can find where mutual understanding is not present. People may assume that everyone knows what is going on and the direction that they are taking, but unless the question is asked or the simple facts are stated, it remains unknown. The stating of such questions reveals what is known.

““STUPID QUESTIONS” ALLOW YOU TO DISCOVER WHAT IS KNOWN AND UNKNOWN

... not all of my basic questions were known to everyone on the team, and sometimes the answers varied by person.”[37]

          Unless the question is asked, the answer is not actually known. An assumption can be made, but this is only theoretically correct, based on what is known, but it can still be different. Unless the question is directly asked, the answer is not known. Assumptions made in social situations can lead to embarrassment, in a work situation they can lead to costly mistakes, in a martial arts situation they can lead to painful mistakes. Ask questions discover actual knowledge. They also discover knowledge about the group.

“Asking questions exposes the limit of a group’s knowledge, and more importantly, highlights incorrect assumptions. By asking questions, we eliminate the risk of missing a hidden improvement opportunity and making decisions without essential information.”[38]

          Questions should be asked about the group as soon as possible so that more can be understood about each member of the group. These questions should inform members of the group about other members of the group about their skills and knowledge; so decisions can be made more accurately about what members can actually do as the group moves forward. Leaders with this sort of knowledge can then utilise group members better or focus their learning better. Questions are for learning and if they are not asked then learning doesn’t happen.

No Learning

          If you don’t ask the “stupid” question, you don’t have to worry about “looking stupid” in front of the group but, “you can’t learn anything if you don’t ask questions. And some of the best learning comes from asking so-called dumb questions.”[39] These elementary questions are simple and aim at the foundation of subjects and allow the individual to learn about the most elementary parts of a subject. The result of asking these questions is that the individual understands the subject better.

“STUPID QUESTIONS” HELP YOU TO LEARN FASTER

One of the biggest deterrents for asking questions is the risk of exposing a lack of knowledge. We fear making a fool of ourselves or wasting people’s time. But by not speaking up and asking questions you risk not learning enough to contribute to the team.”[40]

          “Looking stupid” in front of a group is less damaging than not having the information which will assist you to aid the group of which you are a part. If you do not understand the information which you are being given fully, how are you supposed to use it? If you do not understand what the aim or purpose of the group is, how are you supposed to aid them to this purpose or aim? At a personal level, how are you going to learn about something, if you do not understand it? Not asking questions risks the chance of not learning.

“You’re not always going to be the expert in a given topic, but when you shy away from asking questions out of fear of looking foolish or being irritating, you risk missing a learning opportunity and slowing your progress.”[41]

Not Alone


“Every time you have a question in your head, and you’re nervous to ask it for fear of looking dumb, assume that there are three to five other people in the room with the same question. Just ask the question.”[42]

          In a group of people, when a question arises, it is likely that there are others in the group with the same question. The larger the group the higher the chance that the same question has arisen in their minds. This means that by asking the question you have, you are helping others, and they will thank you for it. Asking questions is a way to maximise the usefulness of the team; to encourage this requires some use of theoretical principles.

Maximise Team


“In order to maximize the likelihood that somebody in the team asks that so-called “stupid” question that ends up saving time and money, we need to understand – and play around with – both human psychology as well as group dynamics.”[43]

          These two theoretical concepts, psychology and group dynamics, are vital in convincing a team to be forward enough to ask questions of all kinds, and especially the so-called “stupid” questions, which are some of the most essential to team effectiveness. Each concept hinges on a part of the make-up of the human being, how they work with others, and an understanding of how they work will assist in making the groups work more effectively.

“psychologically, the key reason why people don't want to ask stupid questions relates to our basic need for belonging and being accepted by others, as explained in the theory of social acceptance.”[44]

          Everyone wants to belong at some level, everyone wants acceptance at some level. Standing up and making yourself stand out, in some form, makes you slightly apart from the group to begin with. Then, there is the asking of the question, which could put a person even further apart from the group, if they do not like the question. Asking questions in a group situation can be a problem.

“The safest thing to do in order to belong is not to stand out, and act in accordance with the norms of the group. Asking a challenging question in a team that has not yet gone through norming is very risky. If you reveal you don’t know something, will that be admired or frowned upon? When the team has not yet established these kinds of norms, asking a question is like sticking your neck out while bright spotlights point at you and enthusiastic, axe-wielding executioners patrol the area. It’s much safer to keep quiet.”[45]

          Not standing up and asking questions, means that the individual does not stand out, so is much safer. Asking a question when new to a team is difficult and challenging because there is the want to belong to the group, without wanting to annoy the group, and asking questions could annoy them. The norms need to be established within the group, that asking questions is a part of the norm and is encouraged. This does not end the problem. The next issue that is faced is that of group dynamics.

“The second obstacle arises from group dynamics. The theory of diffusion of responsibility posits that the larger a group is, the less likely it is that anyone will take responsibility for a specific task. So a team of two is far more likely to take action than a team of four in the same situation. Besides team size, specific roles and expertise give rise to this diffusion of responsibility.”[46]

          Group dynamics shifts the responsibility of a task when it is highlighted through diffusion of responsibility. This includes the asking of questions. Where a question needs to be asked, it will be shifted from one person to another to find the most “appropriate” individual in the group to fulfil the task, this can result in the task simply not being done as each individual avoids the task altogether. The simplest answer to this is that the individual who comes up with the question should ask it. It does not always work out this way. Questions will be avoided to prevent upsetting the status quo.

Psychological Safety


“There are other patterns stacked against asking stupid questions as well. Take confirmation bias, for example: At the beginning of a project, and especially in a consulting setting, we are looking for confirmation that we are ready for this, and the trust others have placed in us is justified. And according to the Ostrich effect, if we pretend a specific risk or problem is not there, it isn’t, and maybe it will go away. Combined, these psychological phenomena are very much linked to the concept of psychological safety.”[47]

          Questions can be asked, and answers given or they can be ignored, this can result where it is more important not to upset the status quo. A group may be in a situation where a project or process has been committed to and questions raise doubts about that process; this can be seen as a threat. The result is that the questions are ignored or pushed to one side as not being important. This is confirmation bias because the process has been in process and must be right because it is happening.
In this situation there must be warning signs and questions asked as to whether the group is taking the questions seriously. Asking questions which may threaten the status quo of an established group is something which will make the individual stand out, and likely that the group does not want to hear. This places many barriers against asking questions. These are aspects which must be taken into account; “psychology matters. We are not logical beings, so often we need to help in order to do the thing we intellectually know is good for us.”[48] Sometimes the help is challenging and is required to be, just as is the asking of the question in the first place.

Perspective


“Just because something is easy for you doesn’t mean it’s easy for other people. Many leaders forget that, so you dismiss questions as dumb because you already know the answer. That doesn’t mean it’s dumb -- it just means it’s not obvious to other people.”[49]

          Perspective is an important thing to have in a group, and vital to acknowledge in being an effective leader. Everyone will not have the same perspective as you do. This means that the individuals in your group may or may not understand what is being presented. Likewise, as a team member it is necessary to understand, other members may not understand the same things as you do. Things will need to be explained to bring everyone to similar understanding. Equally, the same differing perspective can be used.

““STUPID QUESTIONS” PROVIDE A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON HARD PROBLEMS

Sometimes the broad, obvious and seemingly “stupid” questions can have the greatest impact on a team,”[50]

          The seemingly “stupid” question can give a different perspective about a problem and result in a different approach to the problem resulting in a solution to the problem. Differing perspectives expressed in these questions should be utilised to their fullest capacity rather than disregarded. Additionally, questions should be encouraged to promote such problem-solving.

“a beginner’s question can actually be used as a means to reframe the challenge and uncover constraints that can be missed when we lose sight of the big picture.”[51]

          The beginner has the advantage of seeing the problem with “fresh eyes” which have not been influenced and programmed by experience. This means that their perspective of a problem will be different to the more experienced members of the group. The beginner’s questions about elementary aspects of the project can highlight areas where a problem may be solved, or a new approach taken, in this way, beginners should be encouraged to seek knowledge and thus ask questions.

Feedback


“Ask for direct feedback.

Something can be so clear in your head, but unless you learn how to give others the information they need (in the way they need it) in order to execute, both parties will be left in the dark.”[52]

          A person can lecture and present information repeatedly, but without feedback, they do not know if the information is being processed or accepted. A concept can be clear to the person who is delivering it, but unless it is clear to the receiver, there are going to be problems. The only way to figure out whether this is the case is through feedback. The “noise” between deliverer and receiver can create real issues in a learning environment, and causes issues in a work environment as well. It is necessary for leaders to create a culture where giving feedback, through asking questions is a positive.

“The only reason anyone even pointed this out to me was because I had created a culture where they felt comfortable asking stupid questions. They came to me and said, "We don't know what it is you're talking about. Can you clarify?"”[53]

          Leaders need to create a culture in their workplace, or learning environment, or social situation, where asking questions is praised and supported. Here, a person who asks for clarification or further information about something is an asset to the group. One of the skills which seem to be going by the wayside which gives feedback is active listening.

Active Listening


“It’s not made easier by the fact most people these days seem to overlook the value of active listening — one of the greatest assets of the professional individual yet something consigned to history by the vast majority. Active listening helps you reflect what you’re hearing which, by reflecting to your opposite number, helps you remember what you’ve heard.”[54]

          Active listening involves not just listening, but also paying attention to things like posture, body movement and other aspects of the delivery of the message, such as reading the individual’s body language, allowing for a more accurate interpretation of the message being delivered. By using active listening, an individual can grasp more information from what is being presented and gain a greater understanding. With this skill an active listener can also reflect similar body language, so the presenter can see whether the message is being understood.
Reading the crowd as the message is being delivered is important to ensure the message is delivered in the correct manner and with the correct emphasis. Taking the audience into account, allows the delivery to be tailored to the audience to enhance comprehension and retention. Give feedback in the form of questions and body language so they can understand whether the message is being effectively delivered.

Using Logic

Stupid Questions “Defined”


“[Ink Out Loud] defines stupid questions as:
·       Those questions that have already been answered, but the asker wasn't listening or paying attention.
·       Questions that can be answered on one’s own with complete certainty. After all, information found online or from other sources can be wrong, so it never hurts to check.
·       Questions of which the answer should be painfully obvious to any person with a pulse who has lived on this Earth for more than a decade.”[55]

The “stupid” question has been defined, at least in the context of the above, and many would define them similarly. The first implies the individual should have been paying attention or listening to the speaker and so has lost the right to ask the question. If they are seeking information, and the information is pertinent and important, it would be better that the group hears the information again rather than not asking the question.
The second definition contradicts itself. It indicates a question which can be answered with complete certainty on the asker’s own, but then indicates that there might still be room for a question, because the information found online and other sources might be wrong. Further, if the individual was completely certain of the information which they had, they would not be asking the question.
Finally, the last one is heavily culturally-biased. This assumes that the individual has been in the same culture as the asker and group, in the same political and social, possibly even economic situation as the asker and the group. Each one of these elements can change the situation whether a certain piece of information is known. Likewise there is information which is ten or less years old which people simply forget, so here the idea that the question might be stupid is denied again. A person who is asking a question is seeking knowledge, because they don’t know the answer.

Seeking Knowledge

          Seeking knowledge allows a person to grow. To seek knowledge it is necessary for a person to ask questions. The idea that a question can be “stupid” is contradictory, “That's because no question is "stupid" if you don't know already the answer.”[56] If you don’t know the answer to something, you are not going to be able to find out about it unless you ask a question. People ask questions all of the time without even knowing it; they are not always vocalised. Looking for something is asking a question, “Where is that thing?” A seemingly “stupid” question or one with an obvious answer to someone may not be to another person; it depends on the individual’s learning.

“Your questions are valid. You don’t need to be ashamed of not knowing things, especially things that people spend their lives learning about. So if you find a friendly person or venue where you can ask your questions and get satisfactory answers, make the most of it. You never know what you might learn.”[57]

          All questions are valid because they are seeking information. There is no need to be ashamed you do not know something. The way to solve this issue is to ask a question to find out. Experts are more than willing to share their experience and expertise with you and answer your questions. Questions should never be judged on a scale of worth.

“judging things like questions is not beneficial in any way. So, whenever you find yourself thinking, “That's a stupid question,” complete that thought with, “and I’m glad they asked it!””[58]

          The so-called “stupid” questions which are aimed at the core elements, the essential parts of things, and sometimes simply reiterate what has been said, are the key to understanding. They allow people to gain a greater understanding what is being discussed and thus allow them to participate in the group more fully. Being judgemental of other people’s questions does not do anyone any good. Questions allow us to learn about our surroundings and things in it.

Carl Sagan: No Stupid Questions


“Asking “stupid questions” has not only enabled me to learn at an unprecedented pace, but also given me the leverage to help teams work together to solve their hardest problems. If you still don’t believe me, the late Carl Sagan – who was one of the most well-known astrophysicists of the late twentieth century was likely never accused of being stupid - had this to say:

"There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand the world. There is no such thing as a dumb question."”[59]

          In the argument about “stupid” questions it is difficult to argue against one of the most well-known astrophysicists of the late twentieth century. It could be even claimed that if anyone was going to get “stupid” questions it would have been him. He rather claims that the “stupid” question does not exist. Questions are an attempt to understand the world that the individual lives in, such an attempt at understanding should not be criticised. There are further examples of ideas about the “stupid” question.

“A woman, recounting a story about an old man who used to answer all her "stupid questions", explained "Chica, if you ask a question it makes you look stupid for 5 minutes – but if you don't ask – you stay stupid for fifty years, so always ask questions in your life".”[60]

          There is the idea present that the asking of a “stupid” question may make a person look foolish for a short period of time, but not asking the question will make the person look foolish for a much longer period of time. This is demonstrated in situations where a person does not find out all of the information possible about an activity or project, or does not understand about some aspect of it. Instead of asking, goes blindly along, making mistakes and costing the project. “I explained to him that there’s no such thing as a dumb question, but there are dumb actions.”[61] The actions here are the result of not asking the question and are directly linked to one another.
          The same sentiment is found in another quote about “stupid” questions, claiming that if the question is sincere, then the question is not “stupid”. The sincere wish for information seems to dissolve any idea that the question may have an issue of any kind.

“A 1970 Dear Abby column in The Milwaukee Sentinel said: "There is no such thing as a stupid question if it's sincere. Better to ask and risk appearing stupid than to continue on your ignorant way and make a stupid mistake.””[62]

          The same then discusses that it is better to ask the question rather than proceed along without the information and continue along being ignorant and making stupid mistakes. The initial question staves off the mistake that is made and likely saves the individual a lot of effort. Where there is a question, an answer should be sought. Often this will save you trouble later on, and possibly prevent having to repeat or fix mistakes that could have otherwise been avoided.

Conclusion

          The previous discussions have presented other examples how questions are important to learning. Further, that not asking a question can be much worse than asking the question in the long run. Questions tell us about the world around us and should not be judged.
          The definition the concept of the “stupid” question is a contradiction; how can an act of asking for information, indicate an unintelligent act or one which has a lack of reasoned thinking? The two simply do not match, they contradict one another, one is the seeking of information while the other a lack of thinking. Questions need to be thought about to be proposed in the first place, it is their nature. So, by definition, the concept is contradictory. This does not stop our past experiences from intruding and stopping us asking questions.
          In our past there will have been times when we asked a question and were rebuked for it because it was seen as a “stupid” question. The result being that there is now a fear attached to asking questions, especially in group situations, because the question might be a “stupid” one. This builds a fear of looking stupid in front of a group because we lack a piece of knowledge. But knowledge is gained by asking questions. This can lead to real problems.
          There is a fear about asking questions, because of the perceived impression that asking a particular question might give, then questions are not asked. Often, people will go on their merry way with their assumptions about things, or without knowing things. This often leads to mistakes, and can lead to costly mistakes, which could have been simply solved by asking a question in the first place. One of the ideas advocating  asking questions is it is better to ask and look foolish for a short period of time than go off and do something and end up doing foolish things, or looking even more foolish because the question was not asked.
          Questions need to be encouraged. People need to ask more questions and we need to encourage them in all our groups. The best way to do this is to ask questions. This is especially important if we are the leaders. The others will follow the example of the leaders and if they see leaders asking questions, they will ask questions. Promotion of this culture in a group can only increase learning and understanding in the group and this can only be a good thing.
          Questions are attached to group dynamics and psychology. There is no doubt of this. These concepts need to be harnessed to the advantage of the group. Standing up and asking questions need to become the norm rather than deviance in the group. Ensure that it is emphasised that every time that a person asks a question that they are acknowledged as giving to the group rather than taking away from the group. They should be thanked for asking the question rather than rebuked. Create a culture of positive enquiry in your group and it will be to its benefit.
          The concept of the “stupid” question should be actively denied, especially in groups and teams. This can be only to the betterment of the group and the community as a whole. A situation in which an individual is not afraid to get the information that they need is what is needed. A situation in which the individual can ask any question of the group and get an answer to that question can only be of benefit. It must be noted that the questions which are of greatest benefit are the ones which are reasoned, thus have thought put into them, but this does not deny the usefulness of other questions.
          We learn and we find things out by asking questions. We do this all of the time without even knowing that we are doing it. We are always on the search for knowledge. We should not be denying knowledge to anyone just because the question that they are asking may seem obvious to us or any other reason. If the information is worth presenting, it is worth repeating. Encourage the asking of questions and reduce the social fear of asking them.



Appendix 1: Definitions

Stupid

Merriam-Webster (2020a)

“1       a: slow of mind : OBTUSE
b: given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner
c: lacking intelligence or reason : BRUTISH
2: dulled in feeling or sensation : TORPID
3: marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting : SENSELESS
4        a: lacking interest or point
b: VEXATIOUS, EXASPERATING”

Dictionary.com (2020a)

1.     lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.
2.     characterized by or proceeding from mental dullness; foolish; senseless:
3.     tediously dull, especially due to lack of meaning or sense; inane; pointless:
4.     annoying or irritating; troublesome:
5.     in a state of stupor; stupefied:

Wiktionary (2020a)

1.     Lacking in intelligence or exhibiting the quality of having been done by someone lacking in intelligence.
2.     To the point of stupor.
3.     (archaic) Characterized by or in a state of stupor; paralysed.
4.     (archaic) Lacking sensation; inanimate; destitute of consciousness; insensate.
5.     Dulled in feeling or sensation; torpid
6.     (slang) Amazing.
7.     (slang) Darn, annoying.

Question

Merriam-Webster (2020)

1        a        (1): an interrogative expression often used to test knowledge
(2): an interrogative sentence or clause
b: a subject or aspect in dispute or open for discussion : ISSUE
broadly : PROBLEM, MATTER
c        (1): a subject or point of debate or a proposition to be voted on in a meeting
(2): the bringing of such to a vote
d: the specific point at issue
2        a: an act or instance of asking : INQUIRY
b: INTERROGATION
also : a judicial or official investigation
c: torture as part of an examination
d        (1): OBJECTION, DISPUTE
(2): room for doubt or objection
(3): CHANCE, POSSIBILITY

Dictionary.com (2020)

1.     a sentence in an interrogative form, addressed to someone in order to get information in reply.
2.     a problem for discussion or under discussion; a matter for investigation.
3.     a matter of some uncertainty or difficulty; problem (usually followed by of):

Wiktionary (2020)

1.     A sentence, phrase or word which asks for information, reply or response; an interrogative.
2.     A subject or topic for consideration or investigation.
3.     A doubt or challenge about the truth or accuracy of a matter.
4.     A proposal to a meeting as a topic for deliberation.

Appendix 2: Analysis

Stupid

Merriam-Webster (2020a) Data:

“1       a: slow of mind : OBTUSE
b: given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner
c: lacking intelligence or reason : BRUTISH
3: marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting : SENSELESS

Merriam-Webster (2020a) Analysis:

“2” and “4” removed as irrelevant to the discussion in relation to the asking of a question. The definition focuses on “stupid” being unintelligent or indicating an unintelligent act, further that such comes from a lack of reasoning or thinking.

Dictionary.com (2020a) Data:

1.     lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.
2.     characterized by or proceeding from mental dullness; foolish; senseless:
3.     tediously dull, especially due to lack of meaning or sense; inane; pointless:

Dictionary.com (2020a) Analysis:

“4” and “5” removed as irrelevant to the discussion as relation to the asking of a question. The definition focuses on slowness/dullness of mind, foolishness, pointlessness, lack of meaning or sense. This again relates to a lack of reasoning or thinking.

Wiktionary (2020a) Data:

1.     Lacking in intelligence or exhibiting the quality of having been done by someone lacking in intelligence.

Wiktionary (2020a) Analysis:

“2”, “3”, “4” and “5” removed as irrelevant to the discussion as relation to the asking of a question. “6” and “7” removed as irrelevant as they are slang terms rather than proper terms, also not related to the asking of a question. The definition focuses on a lack of intelligence or exhibiting a lack of intelligence, thus is quite narrow and shows why the broader search is most useful.

Question

Merriam-Webster (2020) Data:

2        a: an act or instance of asking : INQUIRY

Merriam-Webster (2020) Analysis:

“1” and “2b” to 2d” removed as not appropriate to the type of “question” being discussed in this investigation. The definition is of an act or instance of asking.

Dictionary.com (2020) Data:

1       a sentence in an interrogative form, addressed to someone in order to get information in reply.

Dictionary.com (2020) Analysis:

“2” and “3” removed as not appropriate to the type of “question” being discussed in this investigation. The definition focuses on a request for information.

Wiktionary (2020a) Data:

Wiktionary (2020)
1       A sentence, phrase or word which asks for information, reply or response; an interrogative.
3       A doubt or challenge about the truth or accuracy of a matter.

Wiktionary (2020a) Analysis:

“2” and “4” removed as not appropriate to the type of “question” being discussed in this investigation. The definition focuses on request for information or a challenge to the accuracy or a matter.



Bibliography

Brandenburg, L. (2010) “The Only Stupid Question is the One You Don’t Ask” in Bridging the Gap, https://www.bridging-the-gap.com/the-only-stupid-question-is-the-one-you-dont-ask/, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Dictionary.com (2020) “Question” in Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/question, [accessed 29/5/2020]

Dictionary.com (2020a) “Stupid” in Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]

Green, B. (2019) “There's No Such Thing as a Stupid Question. Here's How You Can Empower Your Employees to Ask for Help” in Inc., https://www.inc.com/bill-green/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-stupid-question-heres-how-you-can-empower-your-employees-to-ask-for-help.html, [accessed 31/5/2020]

McCormick, J. (2020) “The Power of Asking Dumb Questions” in Entrepreneur Asia Pacific, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/336438, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Merriam-Webster (2020) “Question” in Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/question, [accessed 29/05/2020]

Merriam-Webster (2020a) “Stupid” in Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]

Mission: Engagement (2020) “The only stupid question is the one you didn’t ask...” in Mission: Engagement, https://missionengagement.com/news/the-only-stupid-question-is-the-one-you-didnt-ask/, [31/5/2020]

Scudder, J. (2015) “For a scientist, there really is no such thing as a stupid question” in The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/for-a-scientist-there-really-is-no-such-thing-as-a-stupid-question-36945, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Siersma, L. (2016) “Why Asking Stupid Questions is the Smartest Thing to Do” in Stroud International, https://www.stroudinternational.com/latest-insights/stupid-questions, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Tennekes, P. and Raita, Dr E. (2019) “Why stupid questions are often the most important ones” in Futurice, https://futurice.com/blog/why-stupid-questions-are-often-the-most-important-ones, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Thackeray, D. (2019) “Always ask the stupid questions” in Thacknology, https://davethackeray.com/always-ask-the-stupid-questions-61e13de85d1a, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Wikipedia (2020) “No such thing as a stupid question” in Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_such_thing_as_a_stupid_question, [accessed 31/5/2020]

Wiktionary (2020) “question” in Wiktionary, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/question [accessed 29/5/2020]

Wiktionary (2020a) “stupid” in Wiktionary, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]




[1] Other synonyms of this word may be used such as “dumb” but the essential meaning will remain the same.
[2] Merriam-Webster (2020a) “Stupid” in Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]
[3] Dictionary.com (2020a) “Stupid” in Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]
[4] Wiktionary (2020a) “stupid” in Wiktionary, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stupid, [accessed 29/05/2020]
[5] Merriam-Webster (2020) “Question” in Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/question, [accessed 29/05/2020]
[6] Dictionary.com (2020) “Question” in Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/question, [accessed 29/5/2020]
[7] Wiktionary (2020) “question” in Wiktionary, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/question [accessed 29/5/2020]
[8] Green, B. (2019) “There's No Such Thing as a Stupid Question. Here's How You Can Empower Your Employees to Ask for Help” in Inc., https://www.inc.com/bill-green/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-stupid-question-heres-how-you-can-empower-your-employees-to-ask-for-help.html, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[9] Wikipedia (2020) “No such thing as a stupid question” in Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_such_thing_as_a_stupid_question, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[10] Siersma, L. (2016) “Why Asking Stupid Questions is the Smartest Thing to Do” in Stroud International, https://www.stroudinternational.com/latest-insights/stupid-questions, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[11] Wikipedia (2020)
[12] McCormick, J. (2020) “The Power of Asking Dumb Questions” in Entrepreneur Asia Pacific, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/336438, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[13] Tennekes, P. and Raita, Dr E. (2019) “Why stupid questions are often the most important ones” in Futurice, https://futurice.com/blog/why-stupid-questions-are-often-the-most-important-ones, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[14] Scudder, J. (2015) “For a scientist, there really is no such thing as a stupid question” in The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/for-a-scientist-there-really-is-no-such-thing-as-a-stupid-question-36945, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[15] Brandenburg, L. (2010) “The Only Stupid Question is the One You Don’t Ask” in Bridging the Gap, https://www.bridging-the-gap.com/the-only-stupid-question-is-the-one-you-dont-ask/, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[16] Mission: Engagement (2020) “The only stupid question is the one you didn’t ask...” in Mission: Engagement, https://missionengagement.com/news/the-only-stupid-question-is-the-one-you-didnt-ask/, [31/5/2020]
[17] Thackeray, D. (2019) “Always ask the stupid questions” in Thacknology, https://davethackeray.com/always-ask-the-stupid-questions-61e13de85d1a, [accessed 31/5/2020]
[18] Mission: Engagement (2020)
[19] Tennekes and Raita (2019)
[20] Scudder (2015)
[21] Brandenburg (2010)
[22] ibid.
[23] Scudder (2015)
[24] Brandenburg (2010)
[25] ibid.
[26] Scudder (2015)
[27] ibid.
[28] Green (2019)
[29] Tennekes and Raita (2019)
[30] Mission: Engagement (2020)
[31] Thackeray (2019)
[32] McCormick, J. (2020)
[33] Green (2019)
[34] McCormick (2020)
[35] Green (2019)
[36] McCormick (2020)
[37] Siersma (2016)
[38] ibid.
[39] McCormick (2020)
[40] Siersma (2016)
[41] ibid.
[42] McCormick (2020)
[43] Tennekes and Raita (2019)
[44] ibid.
[45] ibid.
[46] ibid.
[47] ibid.
[48] ibid.
[49] McCormick (2020)
[50] Siersma (2016)
[51] ibid.
[52] Green (2019)
[53] ibid.
[54] Thackeray (2019)
[55] Wikipedia (2020)
[56] Green (2019)
[57] Scudder (2015)
[58] Tennekes and Raita (2019)
[59] Siersma (2016)
[60] Wikipedia (2020)
[61] McCormick (2020)
[62] Wikipedia (2020)